Doyle was the Portland bike commuter who was right-hooked on Monday.
Kudos to the Oregonian for the great video.
Personal news, commentary and ramblings
Doyle was the Portland bike commuter who was right-hooked on Monday.
Kudos to the Oregonian for the great video.
Portland lawyer Robert Reid says it better than I could ever hope to say it: The Portland Police Bureau shouldn’t be allowed to selectively enforce the law.
Unbelievably, it happened at the same intersection where Brett Jarolimek was killed two weeks ago. It hasn’t even been a month since Tracey Sparling was killed by the right hook. No action has been taken to hold any of these motorists accountable for their illegal actions. There’s no excuse for this. How many people must be killed and injured before Mark Kruger starts enforcing the law? What ever happened to “protect and serve”? Does it not apply to cyclists?
Update: The Oregonian has the story on their blog. Here’s the money quote (with my emphasis):
As I mentioned earlier (here and here), I’m not sure that Lt. Mark Kruger is the right person to be in charge of the Portland Police Departments Traffic Division. After reading this article from BikePortland.org, I’m further convinced that the Mayor should get someone else for the job.
After BikePortland initially reported on Bob Verrinder’s collision with a car on Marine Drive a few weeks ago, I thought Verrinder had probably made an error in judgement. Now we find out that Verrinder was crossing Marine Drive when a pedestrian was in the crosswalk and the yellow crossing light was blinking. Prior to this report, the media reported only that Verrinder had crossed Marine Drive without stopping. The Portland Police Department withheld these recently uncovered facts from earlier reports to the media. Why? It is increasingly obvious to me that Lt. Mark Kruger, who heads the Traffic Division, has a serious anti-cycling bias and seeks to exonerate any drivers who collide with bicyclists. It’s no wonder that motorists believe that cyclists are at fault when, in fact, cyclists have the right of way – Kruger’s statements and manipulation of the media reinforce all of their misconceptions.
It seems I’m not the only one whose ire is up because of Lt. Mark Kruger. Jonathan Maus over at BikePortland.org has a terrific article today about the situation including an opinion with popular Portland “bike lawyer” Mark Ginsberg.
The Oregonian also reported today that the driver has 25 speeding convictions and has even lost his license once before. Lt. Kruger maintains that this has no bearing whatsoever on the current case. Oh, and the driver wasn’t available for comment because he was preparing for another long shift. Yes, he will be on the road again soon!
In the meantime, Portland City Commisioner Sam Adams has called an emergency meeting to discuss the matter with relevant parties including representatives from the trucking community, bike community, law enforcement and transportation agencies. I hope he has the ear of the mayor and someone realizes that Lt. Kruger is unable to perform his duties with respect to cyclists.
It happened again. Another truck driver turned right at an intersection and killed a bicyclist in the bike lane. Once again, Portland Police Lt. Mark Kruger is making excuses for drivers and blaming victims. The Oregonian reports Kruger said “that solving the problem requires more than just faulting drivers.” How about we start with faulting drivers who have broken the law and killed someone due to their negligence?
Here’s what Kruger said to The Oregonian after Tracey Sparling was killed by the right hook:
Does this sound like a man who is enforcing the law that protects cyclists? He is not and he wants to further erode cyclists’ rights by passing a law giving motor vehicles the right to drive in the bike lane prior to making a right turn. If passed cyclists would not only have to deal with the right hook from stopped traffic, cyclists would also have to deal with a moving right hook.
I see bike lane violations nearly every single day that I ride my bike. I would be extremely interested to see statistics on the number of citations the Portland Police Department has issued because I suspect that it is extremely low. Timothy S. Wiles, the driver in the Tracey Sparling case, has yet to be charged or even cited the $242 fine for failing to yield to a cyclist. According to all reports this is because Sparling was in the Wiles’ “blind spot.”
A couple of years ago we took some out-of-town friends to Hooters. We ordered the world famous hot wings. When they arrived we were shocked to find that they had what looked like many small hairs sticking out of them. When we told the waitress, she got the manager who told us, “Oh, don’t worry. Those are just feathers.” As if hairs were bad but feathers were good. I suppose some people would accept such an excuse but we haven’t been back to Hooters since.
Kruger sounds like that Hooters manager here: “Yes, an innocent biker was killed as the result of a truck driver not obeying the law, but it’s not what you think. It wasn’t the driver’s fault because he couldn’t see Sparling.” Well, Lt. Kruger, if that’s the case then the driver should be cited for negligence for driving a vehicle which impairs his ability to obey the law. The burden is not on the cyclist here – the law makes that completely clear. The burden is on the driver. If he fails to meet that burden, for whatever reason, he is in violation of the law and should be prosecuted. Find the best trucking company in Kansas City, you will be satisfied with the service. If you are looking for quality towing services check out Jim’s Bensalem Towing, this is a great company if you need towing in Bensalem.
As long as Lt. Kruger doesn’t see this as a crime, truck drivers will continue to run cyclists over with no fear of punishment. No awareness campaign can be mounted for truck drivers and no remedies can be put in place with respect to poorly equipped trucks.
Last night I rode on the memorial ride for Tracey Sparling, the young woman who was run over by a cement truck while trying to cross Burnside on her bike. The ride was mostly silent except for the constant tinkling of sad bike bells in the still night. None of my photos came out as well as this one which shows the “ghost bike” adorned with notes, flowers, candles, etc. See my earlier entry for more details about the accident. A number of people took pictures and posted them on Flickr.
Although the investigation is ongoing, it appears that a young woman died as the result of the right hook, which I have talked about here previously. The photo in the article is disturbing but quite telling. The Oregonian also has a story and a similar photo. Somebody has already placed a “ghost bike” at the scene and a memorial ride is schedule for tonight.
Update: The Oregonian now has a profile of the victim.
Jonathan Maus makes the case for physically separated bike lanes. It’s a good idea but not entirely without problems.
What a great day for riding Friday! No rain and sunny. I even took off my long sleeve shirt for the second part of the ride. Unfortunately, my perfect ride was ruined by a perfect asshole driver. As I made my way uphill on Broadway towards Alder (the very last block of my ride to work), a car cut into the bike lane and stopped directly in front of me. The driver signalled to parallel park and there was a spot immediately to my right. Traffic was dense to my left and there was not enough room for me to pass her on the right. Also, in downtown Portland, it is illegal to ride on the sidewalk. I stopped and considered the situation.
Having been a victim of the right hook before (numerous times but I last wrote about it here), I made a decision to try to inform this driver of her illegal actions. Thus, I waited for the bike lane to become unobstructed or for the driver to get out to discuss the situation. Of course, I was preventing her from completing her parking maneuver, but I thought I had the right of way, so I waited.
Soon the passenger opened her door, got out and walked past me to survey the parking spot. Evidently satisfied with its suitability, she approached me and proceeded to yell at me for being in the way. I ignored her until she asked if I would move, to which I replied that I was waiting for them to do precisely the same thing. Furthermore, I explained that she was illegally blocking the bike lane creating a hazardous traffic situation. This made her madder and she yelled some more.
Soon, a meter maid happened by and queried the passenger about the situation. She complained about the presence of a biker in the bike lane and requested that the meter maid do something about it. She asked me my side of the story and I gave it to her, adding that I was just waiting for them and would she be writing them a ticket for illegally stopping in a bike lane? “No, she wouldn’t,” she said, “because they have a right to cross the bike lane in order to get to the parking spot.” I pointed out that they had gone beyond that and were actually stopped in the bike lane and blocking bike traffic. She requested that I back up to which I asked if she would make the same request of a car in the street. She said yes, but her eyes said no. My requests for what exactly the law had to say on the matter fell on deaf ears and soon she walked away and started muttering into the radio she carried with her. This was a bit alarming.
Since I was starting to doubt whether I was on the right side of the law, when I noticed that another car had tried to pull into the disputed parking space, I took the opportunity to take my leave on foot via the sidewalk. As I walked away, the meter maid had some more choice words to which my response was to get her identification number.
When I got to my office, I looked out the window to the scene below where it had happened (yes, right underneath my window). The two women were still talking to the meter maid but there was no sign of the cops. The meter maid was writing something down as the ladies talked, but I have no idea what it was. The cops never did show.
Out of curiousity, I checked my handbook of Oregon biking laws. It is quite unequivocal about the fact that cars must always yield to bicycles in the bike lane. Always.